Amway, 安利

This demo will show you how the new east spring compressed carbon block delivers better performance compared to competitors. Today we'll show the difference in filtration performance between the east spring compressed carbon block and the competitors' extruded carbon block. Here's what makes our east spring compressed carbon blocks better: we use premium ingredients like high quality coconut shells and a multi-step process to mix, mold, heat, and compress into blocks. It's a more expensive manufacturing process that produces a more uniform block, allowing for higher water flow and better contaminant reduction. Now let's look at how the competitors' extruded carbon blocks are made. The ingredients are mixed, heated, and molded in one continuous process that costs less to produce but results in a less uniform block. This can lead to restricted water flow and less effective contaminant reduction when compared to our east spring compressed carbon block filters. Here we're going to showcase water droplet tests to demonstrate how these carbon blocks compare in real life. We'll start by placing drops of water on the competitor's extruded carbon block and on the east spring compressed carbon block. Keep in mind, if water doesn't move through the carbon block, it doesn't get filtered. Watch as the drop of water on the east spring compressed carbon block is immediately absorbed. The design is more porous and has immediately more pathways for the water to flow through, which leads to higher performance. But on the competitors' extruded carbon block, the water remains on the surface. The block is denser and has more melted binder, which prevents easy water absorption and leads to lower performance. The difference is clear in the side-by-side comparison. Next, we'll submerge both carbon blocks in water and force pressurized air through them. The east spring compressed carbon block has smaller pores, which leads to smaller bubbles and more pathways for the bubbles to travel, resulting in higher performance. The competitors' extruded carbon block has larger pores, which leads to larger bubbles and fewer pathways for the bubbles to travel. This results in lower performance. This side-by-side comparison shows a difference. Two important carbon block tests: one compressed result that's clearly better, the east spring water purifier.

益之源净水器Pro仅适用于以市政自来水为水源的家庭生活饮用水的处理请勿在家中自行尝试此演示。益之源净水器Pro高密度活性炭性能演示:益之源 vs 竞品本次演示将为您展示益之源净水器Pro高温烧结活性炭 与竟品的挤出活性炭的过滤效果差异，益之源净水器Pro的高温烧结活性炭的卓越之处在于 精选优质椰壳活性炭等原料经过混合、成型、加热和压缩等多道工序加工而成，虽然这种工艺成本较高但造就了更均匀的滤芯结构既保障了更大的水流量,又实现了更优异的过滤效果现在,我们来看看竞品的挤出活性炭其生产工艺采用一次性的原料连续混合、加热、成型尽管降低了生产成本，但由于结构均匀度较差 水流阻力明显偏大，过滤效果不佳整体性能逊于益之源净水器Pro的高温烧结活性炭接下来,让我们通过水滴测试直观对比两款滤芯的表现，首先，在竞品的挤出活性炭与益之源净水器Pro的高温烧结活性炭表面各滴一滴水

，注意若水无法渗入滤芯则表明过滤效果不佳，可以看到,在益之源净水器Pro的高温烧结活性炭上水滴被瞬间吸收，其多孔结构形成畅通水路带来更优过滤性能，而在竞品的挤出活性炭上水滴滞留表面竞品滤芯因密度过高且粘合剂熔融过度导致吸水困难，过滤性能受限 对比之下优劣立现接下来，我们将两款活性炭阻隔滤芯浸入水中进行加压通气测试益之源净水器Pro的高温烧结活性炭的孔隙更细密产生的气泡密集均匀，气流通行顺畅，过滤性能更优，相比之下，精品的挤出活性炭孔隙较大产生的气泡稀疏不匀，气流通行明显受阻，过滤效果逊色不少，对比实验再次证实了性能差异 两项关键测试得出明确结论益之源净水器Pro滤芯，表现更胜一筹